Why Christians Differ in Doctrine: A Theological Study

Why Christians Differ in Doctrine: A Theological Study

Why Christians Differ in Doctrine

A theological and historical study

From the earliest days of the church, Christians have disagreed on matters of faith and practice. Some differences concern the core of the gospel (e.g., the person of Christ, justification by faith), while others involve secondary or even minor issues (e.g., food laws, church polity, or worship forms). Why, if believers share one Lord, one faith, and one baptism (Ephesians 4:5), do doctrinal differences persist? This study seeks to explore the reasons through a biblical, historical, and theological lens.

“For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.” — 1 Corinthians 13:12 (KJV)

1. Biblical Witness to Disagreement

The New Testament itself acknowledges that believers will sometimes differ. In Acts 15, the Jerusalem Council met to resolve the dispute about Gentile circumcision. In Galatians 2, Paul opposed Peter publicly for compromising gospel freedom. In Romans 14, Paul exhorted believers not to despise one another over disputable matters such as eating meat or observing days.

Scripture shows that doctrinal differences are not new; they have always been part of the church’s life. Yet, it also shows that God provides means of resolution — councils, apostolic teaching, and charity rooted in the gospel.

2. Historical Factors

Church history is marked by theological development through both unity and division. The ecumenical councils of Nicaea (A.D. 325) and Chalcedon (A.D. 451) defined core truths about the Trinity and Christ. Later, the Reformation (16th century) exposed deep rifts concerning justification, Scripture, and the sacraments. New denominations and confessions arose as believers sought to preserve fidelity to Scripture as they understood it.

Historical contexts — political pressures, cultural movements, and even persecution — often sharpened differences and produced divergent emphases. For example, the medieval church’s focus on sacramental mediation contrasted with the Reformers’ emphasis on faith alone, shaped in part by pastoral concerns over assurance of salvation.

3. Theological and Hermeneutical Factors

At the root of many differences is interpretation of Scripture. Christians affirm the Bible as inspired and authoritative, yet hermeneutical approaches vary. Some emphasize literal readings, others allegorical or typological. Some prioritize systematic theology, others biblical theology.

Doctrinal diversity also reflects different emphases: one tradition may stress God’s sovereignty, another human responsibility. Both truths are biblical, yet the weight given to one or the other can shape theology and practice differently.

4. Human and Cultural Factors

Sin remains present in the church, affecting our understanding. Pride, self-interest, and partisanship often distort theological judgment. Paul warned against such divisions in 1 Corinthians 1:12, where believers rallied around different leaders.

Cultural and philosophical influences also play a role. Early Christianity interacted with Greek philosophy; modern churches wrestle with secularism, rationalism, and cultural relativism. These pressures often shape how doctrines are articulated or defended.

5. Divine Providence and Doctrinal Development

Remarkably, God has used disagreements to refine and clarify truth. The Arian controversy led to precise confession of Christ’s divinity. The Reformation brought renewed clarity on justification and Scripture. Disputes, though painful, have often forced the church to search the Scriptures more deeply and to confess the faith more clearly.

Thus, doctrinal diversity, while a result of human weakness, can be used by God in his providence to strengthen his people and preserve the gospel.

6. Major vs. Minor Doctrines

Not all doctrines are of equal weight. Theologians often distinguish between primary doctrines (essential for salvation, such as the Trinity, deity of Christ, justification by faith), secondary doctrines (important for church order, such as baptism, church government), and tertiary matters (personal convictions, such as diet, music, or feast days).

Disagreement over essentials threatens the gospel itself and cannot be compromised. But on secondary and tertiary matters, Christians are called to charity and patience (Romans 14:1–6).

7. Contemporary Relevance

Today, Christians encounter a wide range of denominations and traditions. While diversity may seem discouraging, it also testifies to the gospel’s spread across cultures and times. The challenge for believers is to discern between differences that undermine the gospel and those that enrich the body of Christ.

True unity is not uniformity but shared allegiance to Christ and his Word. As Paul exhorts in Ephesians 4:15, we are to “speak the truth in love,” holding fast to sound doctrine while bearing with one another in humility.

“In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, charity.” — often attributed to Rupertus Meldenius

8. Conclusion

Doctrinal differences exist because of biblical interpretation, historical development, cultural influence, and human sin. Yet God in his providence uses them to clarify truth, refine the church, and remind believers of their dependence on Christ, the Head of the body. Christians are called to pursue both truth and love, contending earnestly for the faith (Jude 3) while seeking the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace (Ephesians 4:3).

Prayer:
Lord Jesus, You are the Truth and the Head of the church. Guard us from error, deliver us from pride, and grant us wisdom to discern between essentials and non-essentials. Teach us to love one another in the truth, so that the world may see Your glory in Your people. Amen.

Suggested reading: Alister McGrath, Christian Theology: An Introduction; J. I. Packer, Concise Theology; Michael Reeves, Theologians You Should Know.

Post a Comment

0 Comments